| Algorithmic labeling in hierarchical classifications of publications: Evaluation of bibliographic fields and term weighting approaches | 1 | 0.35 | 2021 |
| Large-Scale Comparison Of Bibliographic Data Sources: Scopus, Web Of Science, Dimensions, Crossref, And Microsoft Academic | 0 | 0.34 | 2021 |
| An Interactive Visual Tool for Scientific Literature Search - Proposal and Algorithmic Specification. | 0 | 0.34 | 2019 |
| Field normalization of scientometric indicators. | 2 | 0.50 | 2018 |
| From Louvain To Leiden: Guaranteeing Well-Connected Communities | 19 | 0.81 | 2018 |
| The Closer the Better: Similarity of Publication Pairs at Different Cocitation Levels | 5 | 0.41 | 2018 |
| Systematic analysis of agreement between metrics and peer review in the UK REF. | 2 | 0.37 | 2018 |
| Characterizing in-text citations in scientific articles: A large-scale analysis. | 11 | 0.71 | 2018 |
| Exploration of Reproducibility Issues in Scientometric Research Part 2: Conceptual Reproducibility. | 0 | 0.34 | 2018 |
| Analyzing The Activities Of Visitors Of The Leiden Ranking Website | 0 | 0.34 | 2018 |
| Use of the journal impact factor for assessing individual articles need not be wrong. | 7 | 0.56 | 2017 |
| Topic identification challenge. | 3 | 0.47 | 2017 |
| Special section on performance-based research funding systems. | 1 | 0.36 | 2017 |
| Citation-based clustering of publications using CitNetExplorer and VOSviewer. | 25 | 0.78 | 2017 |
| Constructing bibliometric networks: A comparison between full and fractional counting. | 27 | 1.23 | 2016 |
| Special section on size-independent indicators in citation analysis. | 1 | 0.34 | 2016 |
| Conceptual difficulties in the use of statistical inference in citation analysis. | 0 | 0.34 | 2016 |
| The elephant in the room: The problem of quantifying productivity in evaluative scientometrics. | 5 | 0.43 | 2016 |
| Special section on statistical inference in citation analysis. | 0 | 0.34 | 2016 |
| Clustering Scientific Publications Based On Citation Relations: A Systematic Comparison Of Different Methods | 5 | 0.43 | 2015 |
| Field-normalized citation impact indicators and the choice of an appropriate counting method. | 44 | 1.49 | 2015 |
| Large-Scale Analysis of the Accuracy of the Journal Classification Systems of Web of Science and Scopus | 27 | 0.94 | 2015 |
| Field-normalized citation impact indicators using algorithmically constructed classification systems of science. | 51 | 1.28 | 2015 |
| A review of the literature on citation impact indicators | 28 | 0.92 | 2015 |
| Systematic Retrieval of Scientific Literature based on Citation Relations: Introducing the CitNetExplorer Tool. | 4 | 0.44 | 2014 |
| The correlation between citation-based and expert-based assessments of publication channels: SNIP and SJR vs. Norwegian quality assessments. | 11 | 0.59 | 2014 |
| F1000 Recommendations as a Potential New Data Source for Research Evaluation: A Comparison With Citations | 21 | 1.18 | 2014 |
| CitNetExplorer: A new software tool for analyzing and visualizing citation networks. | 44 | 1.50 | 2014 |
| Counting publications and citations: Is more always better? | 13 | 0.87 | 2013 |
| A systematic empirical comparison of different approaches for normalizing citation impact indicators. | 45 | 1.37 | 2013 |
| A smart local moving algorithm for large-scale modularity-based community detection. | 50 | 1.67 | 2013 |
| Source normalized indicators of citation impact: an overview of different approaches and an empirical comparison | 48 | 1.46 | 2013 |
| F1000 recommendations as a new data source for research evaluation: A comparison with citations | 37 | 1.80 | 2013 |
| A mathematical analysis of the long-run behavior of genetic algorithms for social modeling | 1 | 0.35 | 2012 |
| On the calculation of percentile-based bibliometric indicators | 53 | 1.98 | 2012 |
| Research collaboration and the expanding science grid: Measuring globalization processes worldwide | 3 | 0.39 | 2012 |
| An empirical analysis of the use of alphabetical authorship in scientific publishing. | 33 | 2.00 | 2012 |
| Some modifications to the SNIP journal impact indicator. | 52 | 1.56 | 2012 |
| Universality of citation distributions revisited | 21 | 0.91 | 2012 |
| Citation Analysis May Severely Underestimate The Impact Of Clinical Research As Compared To Basic Research | 15 | 0.86 | 2012 |
| A new methodology for constructing a publication-level classification system of science | 124 | 3.83 | 2012 |
| The Leiden ranking 2011/2012: Data collection, indicators, and interpretation | 137 | 6.15 | 2012 |
| Text mining and visualization using VOSviewer | 30 | 1.13 | 2011 |
| On the correlation between bibliometric indicators and peer review: reply to Opthof and Leydesdorff. | 10 | 0.71 | 2011 |
| Globalisation of science in kilometres | 17 | 1.38 | 2011 |
| The detection of "hot regions" in the geography of science: A visualization approach by using density maps | 20 | 1.05 | 2011 |
| The inconsistency of the h-index | 92 | 3.34 | 2011 |
| Towards a new crown indicator: an empirical analysis. | 92 | 3.27 | 2011 |
| A recursive field-normalized | 0 | 0.34 | 2011 |
| A recursive field-normalized bibliometric performance indicator: an application to the field of library and information science. | 28 | 0.84 | 2011 |
