Name
Playground
About
FAQ
GitHub
Playground
Shortest Path Finder
Community Detector
Connected Papers
Author Trending
Tidjani Négadi
Adam Gleave
Keith Krause
Jhonathan Pinzon
Alex Graudenzi
Giovanni Venturelli
Yibin Fang
Chen Ma
Jing-Sheng Wong
Radu Timofte
Home
/
Author
/
DONG LIU
Author Info
Open Visualization
Name
Affiliation
Papers
DONG LIU
Department of Applied Physics, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
15
Collaborators
Citations
PageRank
20
12
5.34
Referers
Referees
References
25
29
6
Publications (15 rows)
Collaborators (20 rows)
Referers (25 rows)
Referees (29 rows)
Title
Citations
PageRank
Year
Shape-Driven EIT Reconstruction Using Fourier Representations
1
0.35
2021
An Efficient Quasi-Newton Method For Nonlinear Inverse Problems Via Learned Singular Values
0
0.34
2021
Shape-Driven Difference Electrical Impedance Tomography
1
0.35
2020
Shape Reconstruction Using Boolean Operations in Electrical Impedance Tomography
2
0.37
2020
B-spline level set method for shape reconstruction in Electrical Impedance Tomography.
0
0.34
2020
Multiphase Conductivity Imaging With Electrical Impedance Tomography and B-Spline Level Set Method
0
0.34
2020
CT Image-Guided Electrical Impedance Tomography for Medical Imaging.
0
0.34
2020
A Statistical Shape Constrained Reconstruction Framework for Electrical Impedance Tomography.
1
0.35
2019
Less is often more: Applied inverse problems using -forward models.
0
0.34
2019
A Parametric Level Set-Based Approach to Difference Imaging in Electrical Impedance Tomography.
0
0.34
2019
B-spline based sharp feature preserving shape reconstruction approach for electrical impedance tomography.
0
0.34
2019
Dominant-Current Deep Learning Scheme for Electrical Impedance Tomography.
4
0.43
2019
A moving morphable components based shape reconstruction framework for electrical impedance tomography.
0
0.34
2019
A Parametric Level Set Method for Electrical Impedance Tomography.
2
0.42
2018
Nonlinear Difference Imaging Approach to Three-Dimensional Electrical Impedance Tomography in the Presence of Geometric Modeling Errors.
1
0.35
2016
1