Title
Situation awareness recovery.
Abstract
Objective: We describe a novel concept, situation awareness recovery (SAR), and we identify perceptual and cognitive processes that characterize SAR. Background: Situation awareness (SA) is typically described in terms of perceiving relevant elements of the environment, comprehending how those elements are integrated into a meaningful whole, and projecting that meaning into the future. Yet SA fluctuates during the time course of a task, making it important to understand the process by which SA is recovered after it is degraded. Method: We investigated SAR using different types of interruptions to degrade SA. In Experiment 1, participants watched short videos of an operator performing a supervisory control task, and then the participants were either interrupted or not interrupted, after which SA was assessed using a questionnaire. In Experiment 2, participants performed a supervisory control task in which they guided vehicles to their respective targets and either experienced an interruption, during which they performed a visual search task in a different panel, or were not interrupted. Results: The SAR processes we identified included shorter fixation durations, increased number of objects scanned, longer resumption lags, and a greater likelihood of refixating on objects that were previously looked at. Conclusions: We interpret these findings in terms of the memory-for-goals model, which suggests that SAR consists of increased scanning in order to compensate for decay, and previously viewed cues act as associative primes that reactivate memory traces of goals and plans.
Year
DOI
Venue
2014
10.1177/0018720813506223
HUMAN FACTORS
Keywords
Field
DocType
attention,supervisory control,eye movements,memory for goals,situation awareness
Social psychology,Visual search,Information processing,Simulation,Experimental psychology,Situation awareness,Supervisory control,Psychology,Cognition,Perception,Visual perception
Journal
Volume
Issue
ISSN
56
4
0018-7208
Citations 
PageRank 
References 
2
0.39
12
Authors
4
Name
Order
Citations
PageRank
Daniel Gartenberg1212.30
Leonard Breslow220.39
J Malcolm McCurry3437.42
J. Gregory Trafton484191.79