Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
Spreadsheet engineering methodologies are diverse and sometimes contradictory. It is difficult for spreadsheet developers to identify a spreadsheet engineering methodology that is appropriate for their class of spreadsheet, with its unique combination of goals, type of problem, and available time and resources. There is a lack of well-organized, proven methodologies with known costs and benefits for well-defined spreadsheet classes. It is difficult to compare and critically evaluate methodologies. We present a paradigm for organizing and interpreting spreadsheet engineering recommendations. It systematically addresses the myriad choices made when developing a spreadsheet, and explicitly considers resource constraints and other development parameters. This paradigm provides a framework for evaluation, comparison, and selection of methodologies, and a list of essential elements for developers or codifiers of new methodologies. This paradigm identifies gaps in our knowledge that merit further research. |
Year | Venue | Keywords |
|---|---|---|
2008 | Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research | human computer interaction,costs and benefits |
Field | DocType | Volume |
Data science,Computer science,Cost–benefit analysis,Human–computer interaction,Management science | Journal | abs/0802.3 |
ISSN | Citations | PageRank |
Proc. European Spreadsheet Risks Int. Grp. (EuSpRIG) 2004 23-33
ISBN 1 902724 94 1 | 11 | 1.02 |
References | Authors | |
7 | 2 | |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Thomas A. Grossman | 1 | 81 | 15.91 |
| Ozgur Ozluk | 2 | 56 | 8.92 |