Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
The development of the Event-B formal method and the supporting tools Rodin and ProB was guided by practical experiences with the B-Method, the Z specification notation, VDM and similar practical formal methods. The case study discussed in this article -- a cruise control system -- is a serious test of industrial use. We report on where Event-B and its tools have succeeded, where they have not. We also report on advances that were inspired by the case study. Interestingly, the case study was not a pure formal methods problem. In addition to Event-B, it used Problem Frames for capturing requirements. The interaction between the two proved to be crucial for the success of the case study. The heart of the problem was tracing informal requirements from Problem Frames descriptions to formal Event-B models. To a large degree, this issue dictated the approach that had to be used for formal modelling. A dedicated record theory and dedicated tool support were required. The size of the formal models rather than complex individual formulas was the main challenge for tool support. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2011 | 10.1007/978-3-642-24559-6_15 | ICFEM |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
problem frames,pure formal methods problem,similar practical formal method,formal modelling,problem frames description,formal event-b model,event-b formal method,dedicated record theory,formal model,case study | Formal system,Notation,Software engineering,Computer science,Cruise control,Algorithm,Theoretical computer science,Formal specification,Formal methods,Proof obligation,Tracing,Formal verification | Conference |
Volume | ISSN | Citations |
6991 | 0302-9743 | 10 |
PageRank | References | Authors |
0.72 | 10 | 6 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Rainer Gmehlich | 1 | 10 | 1.74 |
Katrin Grau | 2 | 10 | 1.06 |
Stefan Hallerstede | 3 | 654 | 44.88 |
Michael Leuschel | 4 | 2156 | 135.89 |
Felix Lösch | 5 | 11 | 1.08 |
Daniel Plagge | 6 | 133 | 7.78 |