Title
A MAIC approach to TFT-LCD panel quality improvement
Abstract
The liquid crystal displays (LCDs) possess the most mature technology and best consuming competitiveness in the flat panel display (FPD) industries. Of all the LCDs, thin film transistor-liquid crystal display (TFT-LCD) keeps some real advantages. It is thinner, smaller and lighter than other displays and has low power consumption, low-radiation, high-contrast and high-dpi at the same time. Hence, the TFT-LCD panel is widely applied in daily electronic products, and the demand for the TFT-LCD panel increases. The product life cycle of the TFT-LCD panel is gradually getting into the mature stage, and meanwhile, Taiwan’s firms face fierce competition from South Korea and Japan. Thus, at present, continual cost reduction is an all-out pursuing topic for Taiwan’s panel manufacturers. If the quality and yield of the TFT-LCD panel can be effectively enhanced, the non-conforming rate and the cost of the TFT-LCD panel will be reduced. In this study, TFT-LCD panel manufacturing process is discussed, and then five critical-to-quality (CTQ) characteristics (or sub-processes) are identified and summarized. At the early stages, the assessing model of process quality index (Cpm) and the MAIC (i.e., measure-analyze-improve-control) approach of Six Sigma are used to measure and analyze the CTQ characteristics that make TFT-LCD panel unqualified and incapable. During the later stages, Hartley’s homogeneity test and joint confidence intervals were conducted to determine the optimal parameter setting of the critical factor in TFT-LCD panel manufacturing process. By using these optimal settings, Six Sigma quality level can be achieved.
Year
DOI
Venue
2006
10.1016/j.microrel.2005.10.003
Microelectronics Reliability
Keywords
Field
DocType
confidence interval,product life cycle,liquid crystal display,quality improvement,six sigma,thin film transistor
Six Sigma,CTQ tree,Mature technology,Liquid-crystal display,Flat panel display,Engineering,Product lifecycle,Reliability engineering,Cost reduction,Quality management
Journal
Volume
Issue
ISSN
46
7
0026-2714
Citations 
PageRank 
References 
7
1.02
3
Authors
3
Name
Order
Citations
PageRank
K.S. Chen1409.35
C.H. Wang271.02
H.T. Chen371.02