Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
Standby power is one of the most critical issues in low power chip applications. In this paper, we have investigated the effects of body bias and source bias in 65nm technology through simulations on SRAM standby current (Isb). The simulation results show a 8X reduction in cell Isb at 125°C FF process corner with a 1.0V NMOS body bias. This has been experimentally verified on a 16Mb SRAM testchip. Source biasing is shown to be a more effective technique for room temperature leakage reduction (~3X lower Isb@0.4V bias). Optimizing the SRAM cell is crucial to meet the product performance requirements across corners and a methodology for the same is also described. The 16Mb testchip was characterized for read disturb, write margin and read current margin at process corners by applying forward and reverse body biases to shift the cell transistor parameters. Different test sequences tailored for the parameter being measured were used to determine the failing bit count in each case. Voltage schmoo plots were generated from the measured data to obtain the Vccmin at each body bias condition. Based on the above, the threshold voltages of the cell transistors for maximum operating margin were derived. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
|---|---|---|
2009 | 10.1109/ISQED.2009.4810340 | ISQED |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
nmos body bias,cell transistor parameter,cell isb,body bias,reverse body bias,standby power reduction,sram testchip,sram cell,body bias condition,sram cell optimization,cell transistor,source bias,chip,fluctuations,sram,data mining,threshold voltage,microelectronics,stability,room temperature,temperature,circuits,transistors,testing,temperature measurement | NMOS logic,Standby power,Leakage (electronics),Computer science,Process corners,Real-time computing,Electronic engineering,Static random-access memory,Transistor,Electrical engineering,Threshold voltage,Biasing | Conference |
Citations | PageRank | References |
3 | 0.48 | 0 |
Authors | ||
17 | ||
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| S. Lakshminarayanan | 1 | 3 | 0.48 |
| J. Joung | 2 | 3 | 0.48 |
| G. Narasimhan | 3 | 3 | 1.50 |
| R. Kapre | 4 | 3 | 0.48 |
| M. Slanina | 5 | 3 | 0.48 |
| J. Tung | 6 | 3 | 0.48 |
| M. Whately | 7 | 3 | 0.48 |
| C-L. Hou | 8 | 3 | 0.48 |
| W-J. Liao | 9 | 3 | 0.48 |
| S-C. Lin | 10 | 37 | 6.03 |
| P-G. Ma | 11 | 3 | 0.48 |
| C-W. Fan | 12 | 3 | 0.48 |
| M-C. Hsieh | 13 | 3 | 0.48 |
| F-C. Liu | 14 | 3 | 0.48 |
| K-L. Yeh | 15 | 3 | 0.48 |
| W-C. Tseng | 16 | 3 | 0.48 |
| S. W. Lu | 17 | 3 | 0.48 |