Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
Identifying alignments between vocabularies has become a central knowledge engineering activity. A plethora of alignment techniques has been developed over the past years. In this paper we present a case study in which we examine and evaluate the practical use of three typical alignment techniques. The study involves the alignment of two vocabularies used in a semantic-search engine for cultural-heritage objects. We show that a sequence can be beneficial. The case study gives insight into evaluation issues, such as techniques for identification of false positives. We see this work as a step to a badly-needed methodology for alignment. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2009 | 10.1145/1597735.1597741 | Journal of Automated Reasoning |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
cultural-heritage object,alignment technique,evaluation issue,central knowledge engineering activity,false positive,vocabulary alignment technique,badly-needed methodology,identifying alignment,past year,typical alignment technique,case study,cultural heritage | Data mining,Information retrieval,Cultural heritage,Computer science,Knowledge engineering,Vocabulary,False positive paradox | Conference |
Citations | PageRank | References |
8 | 0.75 | 6 |
Authors | ||
3 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Anna Tordai | 1 | 110 | 10.99 |
Jacco van Ossenbruggen | 2 | 817 | 87.89 |
Guus Schreiber | 3 | 1448 | 150.58 |