Title
Vectors in a box.
Abstract
For an integer d ≥ 1, let τ(d) be the smallest integer with the following property: if v 1, v 2, . . . , v t is a sequence of t ≥ 2 vectors in [−1, 1] d with \({{\bf v}_1+{\bf v}_2+\cdots+{\bf v}_t \in [-1,1]^d}\) , then there is a set \({S\subseteq \{1,2,\ldots,t\}}\) of indices, 2 ≤ |S| ≤ τ(d), such that \({\sum_{i \in S}{\bf v}_i \in [-1,1]^d}\) . The quantity τ(d) was introduced by Dash, Fukasawa, and Günlük, who showed that τ(2) = 2, τ(3) = 4, and τ(d) = Ω(2 d ), and asked whether τ(d) is finite for all d. Using the Steinitz lemma, in a quantitative version due to Grinberg and Sevastyanov, we prove an upper bound of τ(d) ≤ d d+o(d), and based on a construction of Alon and Vũ, whose main idea goes back to Håstad, we obtain a lower bound of τ(d) ≥ d d/2-o(d). These results contribute to understanding the master equality polyhedron with multiple rows defined by Dash et al. which is a “universal” polyhedron encoding valid cutting planes for integer programs (this line of research was started by Gomory in the late 1960s). In particular, the upper bound on τ(d) implies a pseudo-polynomial running time for an algorithm of Dash et al. for integer programming with a fixed number of constraints. The algorithm consists in solving a linear program, and it provides an alternative to a 1981 dynamic programming algorithm of Papadimitriou.
Year
DOI
Venue
2012
10.1007/s10107-011-0474-y
Math. Program.
Keywords
Field
DocType
upper bound,lower bound,integer programming,dynamic programming algorithm,cutting plane,linear program
Integer,Discrete mathematics,Combinatorics,Mathematical optimization,Upper and lower bounds,Polyhedron,Integer programming,Mathematics
Journal
Volume
Issue
ISSN
135
1-2
1436-4646
Citations 
PageRank 
References 
2
0.41
5
Authors
4
Name
Order
Citations
PageRank
Kevin Buchin152152.55
Jirí Matousek276376.77
Robin A. Moser324012.51
Dömötör Pálvölgyi420229.14