Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
In this paper, I try to identify the strategies that experienced IS project managers say they use to cope with requirements uncertainty on development projects for external clients. I show that project managers say they use different strategies for coping with the different dimensions of requirement uncertainty, as this construct has been formulated in the literature. I then argue that requirement uncertainty should be formulated as a profile construct and not as a latent or aggregate construct as at present, if it is to have pragmatic validity as a guide to action for project managers. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2000 | 10.1109/ASWEC.2000.844575 | Australian Software Engineering Conference |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
different dimension,different strategy,project manager,profit construct,requirements uncertainty,development project,pragmatic validity,external client,requirement uncertainty,contingency management,prototypes,software project management,contingency theory,uncertainty,financial management,software engineering,systems analysis,management information systems,computer applications,project management,profitability,system testing | Management information systems,Systems engineering,Computer science,System testing,Systems analysis,Software project management,Contingency theory,Computer Applications,Financial management,Project management | Conference |
ISBN | Citations | PageRank |
0-7695-0631-3 | 1 | 0.36 |
References | Authors | |
5 | 1 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Tony Moynihan | 1 | 1 | 0.36 |