Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
Performing accurate suggestions is an objective of paramount importance for effective recommender systems. Other important and increasingly evident objectives are novelty and diversity, which are achieved by recommender systems that are able to suggest diversified items not easily discovered by the users. Different recommendation algorithms have particular strengths and weaknesses when it comes to each of these objectives, motivating the construction of hybrid approaches. However, most of these approaches only focus on optimizing accuracy, with no regard for novelty and diversity. The problem of combining recommendation algorithms grows significantly harder when multiple objectives are considered simultaneously. For instance, devising multi-objective recommender systems that suggest items that are simultaneously accurate, novel and diversified may lead to a conflicting-objective problem, where the attempt to improve an objective further may result in worsening other competing objectives. In this paper we propose a hybrid recommendation approach that combines existing algorithms which differ in their level of accuracy, novelty and diversity. We employ an evolutionary search for hybrids following the Strength Pareto approach, which isolates hybrids that are not dominated by others (i.e., the so called Pareto frontier). Experimental results on two recommendation scenarios show that: (i) we can combine recommendation algorithms in order to improve an objective without significantly hurting other objectives, and (ii) we allow for adjusting the compromise between accuracy, diversity and novelty, so that the recommendation emphasis can be adjusted dynamically according to the needs of different users. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
|---|---|---|
2012 | 10.1145/2365952.2365962 | RecSys |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
effective recommender system,competing objective,recommendation algorithm,multiple objective,recommendation emphasis,hybrid recommendation approach,pareto-efficient hybridization,multi-objective recommender system,recommendation scenario,evident objective,different recommendation algorithm,recommender system,hybridization | Recommender system,Data mining,Computer science,Artificial intelligence,Compromise,Novelty,Strengths and weaknesses,Machine learning,Pareto principle | Conference |
Citations | PageRank | References |
21 | 0.81 | 27 |
Authors | ||
4 | ||
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Marco Tulio Ribeiro | 1 | 546 | 21.68 |
| Anisio Lacerda | 2 | 26 | 1.92 |
| Adriano Veloso | 3 | 749 | 54.37 |
| Nivio Ziviani | 4 | 1598 | 154.65 |