Title | ||
---|---|---|
Asynchronous Fast Adaptive Composite-Grid Methods for Elliptic Problems: Theoretical Foundations |
Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
Accurate numerical modeling of complex physical, chemical, and biological systems requires numerical simulation capability over a large range of length scales, with the ability to capture rapidly varying phenomena localized in space and/or time. Adaptive mesh refinement (AMR) is a numerical process for dynamically introducing local fine resolution on computational grids during the solution process, in response to unresolved error in a computation. Fast adaptive composite-grid (FAC) methods are a class of algorithms that exploit the multilevel structure of AMR grids to solve elliptic problems efficiently. This paper develops a theoretical foundation for AFACx, an asynchronous FAC method. A new multilevel condition number estimate establishes that the convergence rate of the AFACx algorithm does not degrade as the number of refinement levels in the AMR hierarchy increases. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2004 | 10.1137/S0036142902400767 | SIAM J. Numerical Analysis |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
afacx algorithm,afac,amr hierarchy increase,afacx,fast adaptive composite-grid,asynchronous fast adaptive composite-grid,elliptic solvers,adaptive composite-grid,accurate numerical modeling,numerical simulation capability,theoretical foundations,fac,adaptive mesh refinement,asynchronous,asynchronous fac method,multilevel structure,elliptic problems,amr grid,numerical process,condition number,length scale,biological systems,numerical simulation | Asynchronous communication,Condition number,Mathematical optimization,Computer simulation,Algorithm,Adaptive mesh refinement,Rate of convergence,Numerical analysis,Mathematics,Grid,Computation | Journal |
Volume | Issue | ISSN |
42 | 1 | 0036-1429 |
Citations | PageRank | References |
2 | 0.39 | 6 |
Authors | ||
4 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Barry Lee | 1 | 48 | 5.29 |
STEPHEN F. MCCORMICK | 2 | 258 | 30.70 |
Bobby Philip | 3 | 75 | 9.67 |
Daniel J. Quinlan | 4 | 652 | 80.13 |