Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
This paper presents a novel argumentation framework to support design debates in an IBIS-based style, by providing an automatic evaluation of the positions put forwards in the debates. It also describes the integration of the proposed approach within the designVUE software tool along with two case studies in engineering design and their initial evaluation by domain experts. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
|---|---|---|
2013 | 10.1007/978-3-642-40624-9_21 | COMPUTATIONAL LOGIC IN MULTI-AGENT SYSTEMS, CLIMA XIV |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
argumentation, design rationale, IBIS | Software tool,Argumentation framework,Computer science,Argumentation theory,Engineering design process,Design rationale,Ibis,Management science | Conference |
Volume | ISSN | Citations |
8143 | 0302-9743 | 2 |
PageRank | References | Authors |
0.38 | 12 | 5 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pietro Baroni | 1 | 722 | 50.00 |
| Marco Romano | 2 | 25 | 1.31 |
| Francesca Toni | 3 | 343 | 27.02 |
| Marco Aurisicchio | 4 | 41 | 4.14 |
| Giorgio Bertanza | 5 | 25 | 1.31 |