Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
With high penetrations of wind energy, different types of wind farm generators do not have the same fault transient characteristics that can complicate the selection and configuration of wind farm grid protection equipment. Incorrect selection of protection equipment will affect the stability and of the power systems. This paper investigates and analyzes the transient characteristics of doubly-fed induction generator (DFIG) under various short-circuit fault conditions for a typical distribution network. Firstly a detailed model of the DFIG and its principles is descried. A realistic of a 99 MW wind farm with 66 units of 1.5 MW DFIG is modeled using RTDS/RSCAD. The transient characteristic of the wind farm with the DFIG units have been analyzed under different short-circuit fault conditions. Results from the fault performance study on the distribution network are presented and discussed. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2011 | 10.1109/ISGTEurope.2011.6162716 | ISGT Europe |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
wind turbines,power generation protection,short-circuit fault conditions,wind energy penetrations,power system stability,asynchronous generators,dfig,wind farm generators,fault transient analysis,distribution network,power generation faults,wind farm,fault diagnosis,rtds-rscad,doubly-fed induction generator,fault transient characteristics,fault analysis,wind farm grid protection equipment,wind power plants,wind speed,generators,wind energy,doubly fed induction generator,power system | Automotive engineering,Wind speed,Fault analysis,Distribution networks,Electric power system,Control engineering,Engineering,Doubly fed electric machine,Wind power,Induction generator,Grid | Conference |
Volume | Issue | ISSN |
null | null | 2165-4816 E-ISBN : 978-1-4577-1420-7 |
ISBN | Citations | PageRank |
978-1-4577-1420-7 | 0 | 0.34 |
References | Authors | |
0 | 5 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Yang Beige | 1 | 0 | 0.34 |
Hui Xue | 2 | 12 | 4.27 |
Bai Dandan | 3 | 0 | 0.34 |
Hu Wei | 4 | 0 | 0.34 |
Jinghan He | 5 | 14 | 7.47 |