Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
In this paper we describe the Ludo case , one of the case studies of the AGTIVE 2007 Tool Contest (see [22]). After summarising the case description, we give an overview of the submitted solutions. In particular, we propose a number of dimensions along which choices had to be made when solving the case, essentially setting up a solution space ; we then plot the spectrum of solutions actually encountered into this solution space. In addition, there is a brief description of the special features of each of the submissions, to do justice to those aspects that are not distinguished in the general solution space. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
|---|---|---|
2007 | 10.1007/978-3-540-89020-1_34 | AGTIVE |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
spectrum,graph transformation | CONTEST,Concrete syntax,Pure mathematics,Graph rewriting,Artificial intelligence,Calculus,Machine learning,Mathematics | Conference |
Volume | ISSN | Citations |
5088 | 0302-9743 | 2 |
PageRank | References | Authors |
0.48 | 6 | 9 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arend Rensink | 1 | 1193 | 93.96 |
| Alexander Dotor | 2 | 17 | 3.20 |
| Claudia Ermel | 3 | 639 | 50.17 |
| Stefan Jurack | 4 | 206 | 11.31 |
| Ole Kniemeyer | 5 | 83 | 8.01 |
| Juan Lara | 6 | 236 | 18.08 |
| Sonja Maier | 7 | 71 | 10.25 |
| Tom Staijen | 8 | 21 | 1.65 |
| Albert Zündorf | 9 | 449 | 69.12 |