Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
Regulatory compliance is increasingly viewed as an essential element of requirements engineering. Laws, but also regulations and policies, frame their provisions through complex structures made of conditions, derogations, exceptions, which together generate a high number of alternative compliance solutions. This paper addresses the problem of modeling, exploring and selecting among alternatives in a variability space defined by laws. Our proposal includes a conceptual modeling framework for laws and reasoning techniques, called Nòmos 2. The proposal is evaluated with a fragment of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA). |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2012 | 10.1007/978-3-642-34002-4_30 | ER |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
requirements engineering,capturing variability,complex structure,alternative compliance solution,high number,accountability act,regulatory compliance,health insurance portability,essential element,conceptual modeling framework,reasoning technique,variability,requirement engineering | Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act,Conceptual model,Computer science,Requirements engineering,Law | Conference |
Citations | PageRank | References |
28 | 1.17 | 16 |
Authors | ||
6 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Alberto Siena | 1 | 297 | 27.63 |
Ivan Jureta | 2 | 308 | 23.00 |
Silvia Ingolfo | 3 | 97 | 7.35 |
Angelo Susi | 4 | 1057 | 83.69 |
Anna Perini | 5 | 1165 | 83.51 |
John Mylopoulos | 6 | 10956 | 1569.74 |