Title | ||
---|---|---|
Blind and Semiblind Channel Estimation for Single-Carrier Block Transmission Systems Using Few Received Blocks |
Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
In this paper, the blind and semiblind channel estimation and equalization are investigated for zero-padding single-carrier block transmission (ZP-SCBT) systems using second-order statistics. Unlike the conventional channel estimation techniques, the proposed approach focuses on identifying the inverse of the channel impulse response rather than the channel response itself by skillfully exploiting the redundancy of the zero-padding. One interesting advantage of the proposed blind and semiblind approach is that the number of received blocks needed for blind identification is significantly reduced compared to the subspace method. Moreover, the computational complexity of the proposed approaches is much lower than the existing subspace methods. Simulation results are provided to demonstrate that the performance of the proposed approach is superior to the subspace-based blind methods. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2011 | 10.1109/icc.2011.5963066 | ICC |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
zp-scbt systems,blind identification,second-order statistics,single-carrier block transmission systems,semiblind channel estimation,blind equalisers,higher order statistics,computational complexity,channel impulse response,subspace-based blind methods,channel estimation,zero-padding single-carrier block transmission,correlation,ofdm,signal to noise ratio,frequency domain analysis | Equalization (audio),Subspace topology,Computer science,Higher-order statistics,Signal-to-noise ratio,Algorithm,Communication channel,Real-time computing,Redundancy (engineering),Statistics,Blind equalization,Orthogonal frequency-division multiplexing | Conference |
Volume | Issue | ISSN |
null | null | 1550-3607 E-ISBN : 978-1-61284-231-8 |
ISBN | Citations | PageRank |
978-1-61284-231-8 | 1 | 0.36 |
References | Authors | |
6 | 3 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
wenjun zeng | 1 | 2029 | 220.14 |
Xi-Lin Li | 2 | 547 | 34.85 |
En Cheng | 3 | 152 | 20.81 |