Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
Election data represent a precious source of information to study human behavior at a large scale. In proportional elections with open lists, the number of votes received by a candidate, rescaled by the average performance of all competitors in the same party list, has the same distribution regardless of the country and the year of the election. Here we provide the first thorough assessment of this claim. We analyzed election datasets of 15 countries with proportional systems. We confirm that a class of nations with similar election rules fulfill the universality claim. Discrepancies from this trend in other countries with open-lists elections are always associated with peculiar differences in the election rules, which matter more than differences between countries and historical periods. Our analysis shows that the role of parties in the electoral performance of candidates is crucial: alternative scalings not taking into account party affiliations lead to poor results. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
|---|---|---|
2012 | 10.1038/srep01049 | SCIENTIFIC REPORTS |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
behavior,politics | Econometrics,Probability and statistics,Economics,Proportional representation,Universality (philosophy),Voting behavior,Politics,Competitor analysis,First-past-the-post voting | Journal |
Volume | ISSN | Citations |
3 | 2045-2322 | 6 |
PageRank | References | Authors |
0.67 | 0 | 3 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arnab Chatterjee | 1 | 17 | 4.35 |
| Marija Mitrovic | 2 | 76 | 7.19 |
| Santo Fortunato | 3 | 4209 | 212.38 |