Name
Title | ||
|---|---|---|
A Comparison Between the GPI and PID Controllers for the Stabilization of a DC–DC “Buck” Converter: A Field Programmable Gate Array Implementation |
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
This paper presents a comparison between two stabilizing average output feedback controllers implemented on a field programmable gate array (FPGA) facility. A generalized proportional integral (GPI) controller and a proportional integral derivative (PID) controller are implemented using an FPGA, and their respective performances are duly compared. The GPI controller is found to present a better dynamic response than the PID controller in terms of the settling time while exhibiting a greater degree of robustness regarding disturbance rejection represented by severe changes in static and dynamic loads. The average controllers and their corresponding pulsewidth modulation actuators are implemented using a Spartan 3E1600 FPGA. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
|---|---|---|
2011 | 10.1109/TIE.2011.2123857 | Industrial Electronics, IEEE Transactions |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
DC-DC power convertors,PI control,field programmable gate arrays,three-term control,voltage control,GPI controllers,PID controllers,Spartan 3E1600 FPGA,dc-dc buck converter,field programmable gate array,generalized proportional integral controller,proportional integral derivative controller,pulsewidth modulation actuators,stabilizing average output feedback controllers,voltage regulation,Buck converter,dc–dc power conversion,field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs),generalized proportional integral (GPI) and proportional integral derivative (PID) control systems | Control theory,PID controller,Control theory,Settling time,Field-programmable gate array,Pulse-width modulation,Control engineering,Robustness (computer science),Electronic engineering,Converters,Engineering,Buck converter | Journal |
Volume | Issue | ISSN |
58 | 11 | 0278-0046 |
Citations | PageRank | References |
3 | 0.47 | 9 |
Authors | ||
8 | ||
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Eric William Zurita-Bustamante | 1 | 4 | 1.50 |
| Jesús Linares-Flores | 2 | 12 | 2.08 |
| Enrique Guzmán-Ramírez | 3 | 17 | 3.22 |
| Hebertt Sira-ramírez | 4 | 203 | 30.42 |
| Zurita-Bustamante, E.W. | 5 | 3 | 0.47 |
| Linares-Flores, J. | 6 | 3 | 0.47 |
| Guzman-Ramirez, E. | 7 | 3 | 0.47 |
| Sira-Ramirez, H. | 8 | 3 | 0.47 |