Title | ||
---|---|---|
The Utilization of Competing Technologies Within the Firm: Evidence from Cardiac Procedures |
Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
This paper examines the role of technological status in determining the rates at which competing techniques are used within a firm. Consistent with prior studies, technological status is measured on the basis of an actor's prior contributions to the body of knowledge concerning a given technique. The empirical analysis considers two treatments for coronary artery disease (CAD), each of which is associated with a distinct professional group within a hospital. These two groups are often characterized as engaging in a "turf war" for patients. After controlling for several factors that might explain technological choice--the clinical severity of patients, the relative quality of the two procedures at a given facility, firm-level financial performance, and other firm-level characteristics--I find that the technological status of the group associated with each technique affects the relative rate at which it is used within a given hospital. Moreover, this effect is strongest for patients at the margin between the two techniques. These results suggest that viewing the choice between competing innovations as a single, firm-level decision may not always capture the true dynamics underlying such a situation. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2003 | 10.1287/mnsc.49.5.599.15145 | Management Science |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
prior study,firm-level financial performance,cardiac procedures,technological status,firm-level characteristic,relative quality,distinct professional group,prior contribution,firm-level decision,relative rate,technological choice,body of knowledge | CAD,Coronary artery disease,Cardiac procedures,Body of knowledge,Economics,Actuarial science,Microeconomics,Financial performance,Operations management | Journal |
Volume | Issue | ISSN |
49 | 5 | 0025-1909 |
Citations | PageRank | References |
3 | 0.87 | 1 |
Authors | ||
1 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Robert S. Huckman | 1 | 143 | 10.38 |