Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
Prognostics and health management (PHM) technology has been widely accepted, and employed to evaluate system performance. In practice, system performance often varies continually rather than just being functional or failed, especially for a complex system. Profust reliability theory extends the traditional binary state space {0, 1} into a fuzzy state space [0, 1], which is therefore suitable to characterize a gradual physical degradation. Moreover, in profust reliability theory, fuzzy state transitions can also help to describe the health evolution of a component or a system. Accordingly, this paper proposes a profust reliability based PHM approach, where the profust reliability is employed as a health indicator to evaluate the real-time system performance. On the basis of the health estimation, the system remaining useful life (RUL) is further defined, and the mean RUL estimate is predicted by using a degraded Markov model. Finally, an experimental case study of Li-ion batteries is presented to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
|---|---|---|
2014 | 10.1109/TR.2014.2299111 | IEEE Transactions on Reliability |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
profust reliability,fuzzy set theory,system remaining useful life,remaining useful life,binary state space {0,prognostics and health management,health estimation,lithium,fuzzy state transitions,lithium-ion batteries,mean rul estimate,li,phm technology,1],1},profust reliability based approach,secondary cells,real-time system performance,degraded markov model,reliability theory,remaining life assessment,fuzzy state space [0,degradation,system performance,estimation,hidden markov models | Prognostics,Markov model,Fuzzy logic,Fuzzy set,State space,Reliability engineering,Mathematics,Reliability theory | Journal |
Volume | Issue | ISSN |
63 | 1 | 0018-9529 |
Citations | PageRank | References |
12 | 0.65 | 8 |
Authors | ||
3 | ||
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Zhiyao Zhao | 1 | 16 | 5.45 |
| Quan Quan | 2 | 70 | 17.08 |
| Kai-Yuan Cai | 3 | 1332 | 121.70 |