Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
Manufacturing simulation and digital engineering tools and procedures have had a positive impact on the manufacturing industry. However, to design a sustainable manufacturing system, a multitude of system dimensions must be jointly optimized. This paper proposes an integrated simulation tool helping to maximize production efficiency and balance environmental constraints already in the system design phase. Lean manufacturing, identification and elimination of waste and production losses, and environmental considerations are all needed during development of a sustainable manufacturing system. Engineers designing the manufacturing system need decision support, otherwise sub-optimization is more likely to occur. We present methods for calculating energy efficiency, CO2 emissions and other environmental impacts integrated into factory simulation software. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
|---|---|---|
2008 | 10.1109/WSC.2008.4736284 | Winter Simulation Conference |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
environmental consideration,sustainable manufacturing system,lean manufacturing,manufacturing system need decision,simulation-based sustainable manufacturing system,environmental impact,system dimension,system design phase,environmental constraint,factory simulation software,manufacturing industry,lean production,simulation software,simulation,cad,design for environment,mean squared error,production efficiency,engineering design,sustainable development,system design,decision support,production,energy efficient | Manufacturing,Systems engineering,Process development execution system,Computer science,Integrated Computer-Aided Manufacturing,Computer-integrated manufacturing,Manufacturing engineering,Lean manufacturing,Advanced manufacturing,Manufacturing execution system,Design for the Environment | Conference |
ISBN | Citations | PageRank |
978-1-4244-2708-6 | 28 | 3.16 |
References | Authors | |
4 | 7 | |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Juhani Heilala | 1 | 45 | 6.76 |
| Saija Vatanen | 2 | 28 | 3.16 |
| Hannele Tonteri | 3 | 28 | 3.16 |
| Jari Montonen | 4 | 36 | 6.49 |
| Salla Lind | 5 | 43 | 5.18 |
| Björn Johansson | 6 | 146 | 20.88 |
| Johan Stahre | 7 | 61 | 11.67 |