Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
UDDI registries are intended to become the world-widelookup mechanism for web-services. As such, the registryhas to provide high throughput, low response times, highavailability, and access to accurate data. Replication is oftenused to satisfy such requirements. Various replicationstrategies exist, favoring different subsets of the above performancemetrics. In this paper, we have a closer look attwo very different replication strategies. One strategy followsthe UDDI speci拢cation, the second uses a middlewarebased replication tool. In this paper, we provide a comparisonof these two approaches focusing on performance andease of integration with an existing UDDI implementation. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
|---|---|---|
2004 | 10.1109/ICWS.2004.35 | ICWS |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
different replication strategy,high throughput,performance andease,low response time,uddi registry replication strategies,closer look attwo,accurate data,different subsets,existing uddi implementation,uddi registry,middlewarebased replication tool,sun,measurement,web services,availability,grid computing,web service,formal specification,internet,throughput,data replication,information retrieval,data access,computer science,middleware,satisfiability,high availability | Middleware,Data mining,World Wide Web,Computer science,Universal Description Discovery and Integration,Formal specification,Throughput,High availability,Database,The Internet | Conference |
ISBN | Citations | PageRank |
0-7695-2167-3 | 11 | 0.83 |
References | Authors | |
15 | 3 | |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chenliang Sun | 1 | 11 | 0.83 |
| Yi Lin | 2 | 192 | 7.89 |
| Kemme, B. | 3 | 1773 | 115.46 |