Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
We present a comparison of a text-driven and a speech driven visual speech synthesiser. Both are trained using the same data and both use the same Active Appearance Model (AAM) to encode and re-synthesise visual speech. Objective quality, measured using correlation, suggests the performance of both approaches is close, but subjective opinion ranks the text-driven approach significantly higher. |
Year | Venue | Keywords |
|---|---|---|
2008 | INTERSPEECH 2008: 9TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL SPEECH COMMUNICATION ASSOCIATION 2008, VOLS 1-5 | visual speech synthesis |
Field | DocType | Citations |
ENCODE,Computer science,Active appearance model,Speech recognition,Correlation | Conference | 0 |
PageRank | References | Authors |
0.34 | 3 | 5 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Barry-John Theobald | 1 | 332 | 25.39 |
| Gavin C. Cawley | 2 | 902 | 59.96 |
| J.A. Bangham | 3 | 484 | 46.38 |
| Iain Matthews | 4 | 4900 | 253.61 |
| Nicholas Wilkinson | 5 | 10 | 1.90 |