Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
Many interpolation methods have been developed for high visual quality, but fail for inability to preserve image structures. Edges carry heavy structural information for detection, determination and classification. Edge-adaptive interpolation approaches become a center of focus. In this paper, performance of four edge-directed interpolation methods comparing with two traditional methods is evaluated on two groups of images. These methods include new edge-directed interpolation (NEDI), edge-guided image interpolation (EGII), iterative curvature-based interpolation (ICBI), directional cubic convolution interpolation (DCCI) and two traditional approaches, bi-linear and bi-cubic. Meanwhile, no parameters are mentioned to measure edge-preserving ability of edge-adaptive interpolation approaches and we proposed two. One evaluates accuracy and the other measures robustness of edge-preservation ability. Performance evaluation is based on six parameters. Objective assessment and visual analysis are illustrated and conclusions are drawn from theoretical backgrounds and practical results. |
Year | Venue | Field |
---|---|---|
2013 | CoRR | Nearest-neighbor interpolation,Multivariate interpolation,Pattern recognition,Convolution,Computer science,Interpolation,Stairstep interpolation,Robustness (computer science),Artificial intelligence,Image scaling,Bilinear interpolation |
DocType | Volume | Citations |
Journal | abs/1303.6455 | 2 |
PageRank | References | Authors |
0.37 | 13 | 4 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Shaode Yu | 1 | 19 | 5.60 |
Qingsong Zhu | 2 | 116 | 13.96 |
Shibin Wu | 3 | 12 | 2.73 |
Yaoqin Xie | 4 | 125 | 21.70 |