Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
We consider a repeated electoral competition game between two parties, each representing a constituent with a given income
level. Parties are unable to commit to a policy before the election; they choose a nonlinear income tax schedule once elected.
In each period, citizens cast a vote either for the incumbent or for the challenger. We first show that there exist (pure
strategy) subgame perfect equilibria where both parties choose the most-preferred tax schedule of their constituent, subject
to the constraint that they are reelected. We characterize a specific class of these BPR (Best Policy with Reelection) equilibria
in which one of the parties plays its constituent’s unconstrained optimal tax function. Equilibrium tax schedules are always
piecewise linear. Depending on the income levels of the two parties’ constituents, we obtain either classical left-vs-right
equilibria (where the poor vote for one party and the rich for the other one) or ends-against-the-middle equilibria (where
both poor and rich vote for one party while the middle class votes for the other party). In both types of equilibria, both
parties propose the same tax schedule to a subset of the population. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
|---|---|---|
2010 | 10.1007/s00355-010-0462-9 | Social Choice and Welfare |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
Median Voter, Condorcet Winner, Electoral Competition, Initial Path, Incumbent Party | Population,Economics,Income tax,Mathematical economics,Indirect tax,Strategy,Microeconomics,Optimal tax,State income tax,Subgame perfect equilibrium,Tax reform | Journal |
Volume | Issue | ISSN |
35 | 4 | 1432-217X |
Citations | PageRank | References |
0 | 0.34 | 3 |
Authors | ||
3 | ||
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Georges Casamatta | 1 | 1 | 0.71 |
| Helmuth Cremer | 2 | 5 | 1.84 |
| philippe | 3 | 6 | 4.34 |