Title | ||
---|---|---|
A process variation tolerant, high-speed and low-power current mode signaling scheme for on-chip interconnects |
Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
Current mode signaling(CMS) scheme is one of the promising alternatives to voltage mode buffer insertion scheme for high-speed low-power data transmission over long on-chip interconnects. In this paper we present a CMS scheme with dynamic overdriving driver (DOD) whose performance is robust against intra-die and inter-die process variations. We show that throughput of the CMS scheme proposed in [1] degrades by 33% in the presence of intra-die process variations whereas that of the scheme in [2] degrades by 36% in the worst case process corner. Simulation results show that throughput of the proposed CMS scheme degrades by only 9.5% in presence of intra-die process variations and 22% in the worst case process corner. In this process corner, logic speed itself degrades by 23% and hence 22% of throughput degradation of the proposed signaling scheme is not a major concern. In the typical process corner, the proposed CMS scheme shows 14% and 19% improvement in delay and power, respectively over CMS scheme proposed in [1]. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2009 | 10.1145/1531542.1531630 | ACM Great Lakes Symposium on VLSI |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
process variation tolerant,inter-die process variation,worst case process corner,low-power current mode,throughput degradation,mode buffer insertion scheme,cms scheme,proposed cms scheme degrades,intra-die process variation,process corner,on-chip interconnects,typical process corner,proposed cms scheme shows,data transmission,chip,process variation | Throughput degradation,Data transmission,Process corners,Computer science,Voltage,Electronic engineering,Real-time computing,Process variation,Throughput,Current mode | Conference |
Citations | PageRank | References |
5 | 0.64 | 2 |
Authors | ||
3 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Marshnil Vipin Dave | 1 | 11 | 1.27 |
Maryam Shojaei Baghini | 2 | 86 | 29.67 |
Dinesh Kumar Sharma | 3 | 48 | 11.91 |