Title | ||
---|---|---|
Convergence Analysis of Wavelet Schemes for Convection-Reaction Equations under Minimal Regularity Assumptions |
Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
In this paper, we analyze convergence rates of wavelet schemes for time-dependent convection-reaction equations within the framework of the Eulerian--Lagrangian localized adjoint method (ELLAM). Under certain minimal assumptions that guarantee $ H^1 $-regularity of exact solutions, we show that a generic ELLAM scheme has a convergence rate $ \mathcal{O}(h/\sqrt{\Delta t} + \Delta t) $ in $ L^2 $-norm. Then, applying the theory of operator interpolation, we obtain error estimates for initial data with even lower regularity. Namely, it is shown that the error of such a scheme is $ \mathcal{O}((h/\sqrt{\Delta t})^\theta + (\Delta t)^\theta) $ for initial data in a Besov space $ \displaystyle B^\theta_{2,q} (0 |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2005 | 10.1137/S0036142903433832 | SIAM J. Numerical Analysis |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
convection-reaction equation,wavelet schemes,minimal regularity assumptions,lower regularity,characteristic method,error estimate,convergence analysis,lagrangian localized adjoint method,generic ellam scheme,displaystyle b,eulerian- lagrangian method,besov space,wavelet method,wavelet scheme,initial data,convection-reaction equations,convergence rate,certain minimal assumption,velocity field,exact solution,finite element method,nuclear waste disposal,finite difference,initial condition,numerical method,first order,numerical simulation | Exact solutions in general relativity,Convergence (routing),Mathematical optimization,Mathematical analysis,Interpolation,Besov space,Operator (computer programming),Rate of convergence,Numerical analysis,Operator theory,Mathematics | Journal |
Volume | Issue | ISSN |
43 | 2 | 0036-1429 |
Citations | PageRank | References |
1 | 0.39 | 4 |
Authors | ||
4 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Jiangguo Liu | 1 | 90 | 11.37 |
Bojan Popov | 2 | 115 | 20.22 |
Hong Wang | 3 | 117 | 24.13 |
Richard E. Ewing | 4 | 252 | 45.87 |