Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
In this paper coherence-based models are proposed as an alternative to logic-based BDI and argumentation models for the reasoning of normative agents. A model is provided for how two coherence-based agents can deliberate on how to regulate a domain of interest. First a deductive coherence model presented, in which the coherence values are derived from the deduction relation of an underlying logic; this makes it possible to identify the reasons for why a proposition is accepted or rejected. Then it is shown how coherence-driven agents can generate candidate norms for deliberation, after which a dialogue protocol for such deliberations is proposed. The resulting model is compared to current logic-based argumentation systems for deliberation over action. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2009 | 10.1145/1568234.1568242 | ICAIL |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
argumentation model,candidate norm,coherence-based agent,coherence-driven agent,norm consensus,coherence value,logic-based bdi,paper coherence-based model,resulting model,deductive coherence model,coherence-driven argumentation,current logic-based argumentation system,argumentation | Deliberation,Proposition,Computer science,Normative,Argumentation theory,Norm (social),Coherence (physics),Artificial intelligence,Probabilistic argumentation | Conference |
Citations | PageRank | References |
5 | 0.51 | 16 |
Authors | ||
2 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Sindhu Joseph | 1 | 28 | 3.23 |
Henry Prakken | 2 | 2440 | 171.29 |