Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
Conversational speech recognition is a challenging problem primarily because speakers rarely fully articulate sounds. A successful speech recognition approach must infer intended spectral targets from the speech data, or develop a method of dealing with large variances in the data. Hidden dynamic models (HDMs) attempt to automatically learn such targets in a hidden feature space using models that integrate linguistic information with constrained temporal trajectory models. HDMs are a radical departure from conventional hidden Markov models (HMMs), which simply account for variation in the observed data. We present an initial evaluation of such models on a conversational speech recognition task involving a subset of the SWITCHBOARD corpus. We show that in an N-best rescoring paradigm, HDMs are capable of delivering performance competitive with HMMs. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
1999 | 10.1109/ICASSP.1999.758074 | ICASSP |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
hidden feature space,conventional hidden markov model,successful speech recognition approach,conversational speech recognition,speech data,hidden dynamic model,switchboard corpus,conversational speech recognition task,observed data,n-best rescoring paradigm,initial evaluation,low pass filters,performance,linguistic information,speech processing,natural languages,speech recognition,acoustical engineering,hidden markov model,trajectory,hidden markov models,feature space,loudspeakers,hmm | Rule-based machine translation,Feature vector,Pattern recognition,Computer science,Speech recognition,Dynamic models,Artificial intelligence,Natural language processing,Hidden Markov model,Trajectory | Conference |
ISSN | ISBN | Citations |
1520-6149 | 0-7803-5041-3 | 21 |
PageRank | References | Authors |
2.96 | 2 | 9 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
J. Picone | 1 | 202 | 26.15 |
S. Pike | 2 | 21 | 2.96 |
R. Regan | 3 | 21 | 2.96 |
T. Kamm | 4 | 30 | 3.65 |
J. Bridle | 5 | 178 | 107.11 |
Deng, Li | 6 | 9691 | 728.14 |
Jeff Z. Ma | 7 | 133 | 15.79 |
H. Richards | 8 | 21 | 2.96 |
Mike Schuster | 9 | 2303 | 111.71 |