Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
The problems of taxonomy evaluation criteria comparison and corresponding benchmark creation are considered. The classes of Primitive Ideal Taxonomies (PITs), their WordNet and disrupted versions are proposed as the sets of benchmark taxonomies for the comparison of taxonomy evaluation methods. For WordNet PITs and their perturbations, the performances of the structure-based PageRank, FloorRank, and the corpus based Information Content criteria are studied in Monte Carlo experiment. It is shown that the proposed approach can be used for the ranking of taxonomy evaluation criteria. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
|---|---|---|
2010 | 10.1109/DEXA.2010.85 | DEXA Workshops |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
information content criterion,wordnet pits,taxonomy evaluation criteria comparison,monte carlo experiment,taxonomy evaluation criterion,taxonomy evaluation,taxonomy evaluation method,primitive ideal taxonomies,corresponding benchmark creation,benchmark taxonomy,monte carlo study,correlation,information content,taxonomy,integrated circuits,monte carlo methods,ontologies,benchmark testing,internet,monte carlo | Ontology (information science),Data mining,PageRank,Monte Carlo method,Ranking,Computer science,WordNet,Benchmark (computing) | Conference |
ISSN | ISBN | Citations |
1529-4188 | 978-1-4244-8049-4 | 0 |
PageRank | References | Authors |
0.34 | 1 | 5 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alexander Ulanov | 1 | 65 | 9.64 |
| Georgy Shevlyakov | 2 | 55 | 8.93 |
| Nikolay Lyubomishchenko | 3 | 0 | 0.68 |
| Pankaj Mehra | 4 | 242 | 44.93 |
| Vladimir Polutin | 5 | 98 | 7.34 |