Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
We show that a careful analysis of co-authorship in publications within a
discipline uncovers interesting properties of the analysed field. We build the
largest collaboration network for computer science ever studied, as well as
those sub-networks that emerge from conference and journal co-authorship only.
We study the three graphs with the latest network analysis toolkit. We find
that the collaboration network for computer science is a widely connected small
world. The node degree distribution is right-skewed and concentrated, but the
connectivity of the network does not crucially depend on star collaborators.
Furthermore, the network is highly transitive and assortative mixed by node
degree, in accordance with most other social networks. The conference
collaboration network is more widely and densely connected than the journal
counterpart, its degree distribution has a longer tail, and it is less
dependent on star collaborators. On the other hand, journal collaboration
establishes a stronger relationship among authors and the journal network has a
more evident core-periphery structure. |
Year | Venue | Keywords |
---|---|---|
2010 | Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research | degree distribution,social network,network analysis |
Field | DocType | Volume |
Data science,Network science,Organizational network analysis,Computer science,Evolving networks | Journal | abs/1010.4 |
Citations | PageRank | References |
0 | 0.34 | 0 |
Authors | ||
1 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Massimo Franceschet | 1 | 658 | 39.91 |