Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
Peer-to-peer applications generate huge volumes of Internet traffic, thus leading to higher congestion, as well as higher
costs for the ISPs particularly due to inter-domain traffic. The traditional traffic management approaches employed by ISPs
(e.g. traffic shaping or even throttling) often lead to a deterioration of users’ Quality-of-Experience. Previous works have
verified that the insertion of ISP-owned Peers (IoPs) can deal effectively with this situation. The mechanism offers caching
while exploiting the self-organizing structure of overlays. Thus, it leads to both improved performance for peers and reduced
inter-domain traffic costs for ISPs. In this paper, we study how the available IoP bandwidth capacity should be allocated
among the various swarms that it can possibly join. In particular, we identify a variety of factors that influence the effectiveness
of Swarm Selection and Bandwidth Allocation, and we investigate their impact on the practically relevant example of BitTorrent,
primarily by means of simulations.
|
Year | DOI | Venue |
|---|---|---|
2011 | 10.1007/978-3-642-19167-1_7 | International Workshop on Self-Organizing Systems |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
traditional traffic management,swarm selection,peer-to-peer application,isp-owned peers,higher congestion,overlay swarm,bandwidth allocation.,cache capacity allocation,peer-to-peer,isp-owned peer iop,performance improvement,internet traffic,cost reduction,available iop bandwidth capacity,inter-domain traffic cost,higher cost,bandwidth allocation,bittorrent,traffic management,self organization,traffic shaping | Swarm behaviour,Peer-to-peer,Computer science,Bandwidth allocation,Computer network,Bandwidth (signal processing),BitTorrent,Traffic shaping,Bandwidth throttling,Internet traffic,Distributed computing | Conference |
Volume | ISSN | Citations |
6557 | 0302-9743 | 4 |
PageRank | References | Authors |
0.43 | 6 | 5 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ioanna Papafili | 1 | 66 | 9.06 |
| George D. Stamoulis | 2 | 459 | 58.70 |
| Frank Lehrieder | 3 | 203 | 16.57 |
| Benjamin Kleine | 4 | 4 | 0.43 |
| Simon Oechsner | 5 | 245 | 20.95 |