Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
Although Modeling and Simulation is successfully applied for several decades, the community only established a handful of M&S specific standards. Although the standards were applied enabling worldwide distributed simulation applications, in particular in the training application domain of military simulation systems, the general success of M&S standard efforts and their potential for general applicability has been debated repeatedly during several conferences and workshop. This collection of position statements discusses related questions, such as, "What makes M&S special that we need M&S standards," "Are M&S standards truly different from Software Engineering Standards," and "What metrics can be used to measure M&S standard success," and tries to contribute to establishing a methodological approach to identify future M&S standard needs. These position statements have been contributed in preparation of a panel discussion and edited for the supporting proceedings. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2011 | 10.1109/WSC.2011.6147999 | Winter Simulation Conference |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
methodological approach,specific standard,position statement,simulation application,general applicability,standard effort,standard need,general success,standard success,military simulation system,future m,computer model,computational modeling,software engineering,modeling and simulation | Military standards,Military simulation,Modeling and simulation,Simulation,Panel discussion,Application domain,Engineering,Management science | Conference |
ISSN | ISBN | Citations |
0891-7736 | 978-1-4799-2077-8 | 0 |
PageRank | References | Authors |
0.34 | 6 | 10 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Andreas Tolk | 1 | 341 | 53.58 |
Osman Balci | 2 | 872 | 175.02 |
Saikou Y. Diallo | 3 | 111 | 21.99 |
Paul A. Fishwick | 4 | 831 | 108.04 |
Xiaolin Hu | 5 | 377 | 43.37 |
Margaret Loper | 6 | 55 | 7.64 |
Mikel D. Petty | 7 | 68 | 12.54 |
Paul F. Reynolds, Jr. | 8 | 284 | 59.96 |
Hessam Sarjoughian | 9 | 76 | 8.67 |
B. Zeigler | 10 | 1035 | 188.72 |