Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
Managing quality during the development, operation, and maintenance of software(-intensive) systems and services is a challenging task. Although many organizations need to define, control, measure, and improve various quality aspects of their development artifacts and processes, nearly no guidance is available on how to select, adapt, define, combine, use, and evolve quality models. Catalogs of models as well as selection and tailoring processes are widely missing. A first step towards better support for selecting and adapting quality models can be seen in a classification of existing quality models, especially with respect to their suitability for different purposes and contexts. This article presents so-called comprehensive quality model landscapes (CQMLs), which provide such a classification scheme and help to get an overview of existing models and their relationships. The article focuses on the description and justification of essential concepts needed to define quality models and landscapes. In addition, the article describes typical usage scenarios, illustrates the concept with examples, and sketches open questions and future work. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2009 | 10.1109/SEAA.2009.88 | EUROMICRO-SEAA |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
comprehensive quality model landscapes,future work,challenging task,various quality aspect,so-called comprehensive quality model,quality model,classification scheme,better support,development artifact,cqml scheme,essential concept,different purpose,software quality management,predictive models,software maintenance,software quality,organizations,quality improvement,context modeling,software engineering,quality assurance | Systems engineering,Computer science,Classification scheme,Software quality management,Context model,Software,Software maintenance,Software quality,Quality management,Quality assurance | Conference |
ISSN | ISBN | Citations |
1089-6503 | 978-0-7695-3784-9 | 9 |
PageRank | References | Authors |
0.70 | 12 | 4 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Michael Kläs | 1 | 96 | 9.50 |
Jens Heidrich | 2 | 205 | 23.46 |
Jürgen Münch | 3 | 1286 | 147.27 |
Adam Trendowicz | 4 | 271 | 20.17 |