Title | ||
---|---|---|
Fast minimum-weight double-tree shortcutting for metric TSP: Is the best one good enough? |
Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
The Metric Traveling Salesman Problem (TSP) is a classical NP-hard optimization problem. The double-tree shortcutting method for Metric TSP yields an exponentially-sized space of TSP tours, each of which approximates the optimal solution within, at most, a factor of 2. We consider the problem of finding among these tours the one that gives the closest approximation, that is, the minimum-weight double-tree shortcutting. Burkard et al. gave an algorithm for this problem, running in time O(n3 + 2d n2) and memory O(2d n2), where d is the maximum node degree in the rooted minimum spanning tree. We give an improved algorithm for the case of small d (including planar Euclidean TSP, where d ≤ 4), running in time O(4d n2) and memory O(4d n). This improvement allows one to solve the problem on much larger instances than previously attempted. Our computational experiments suggest that in terms of the time-quality trade-off, the minimum-weight double-tree shortcutting method provides one of the best existing tour-constructing heuristics. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2009 | 10.1145/1498698.1594232 | ACM Journal of Experimental Algorithmics |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
planar euclidean tsp,tsp tour,classical np-hard optimization problem,metric tsp,improved algorithm,time o,memory o,minimum-weight double-tree,double-tree shortcutting method,minimum-weight double-tree shortcutting,good enough,minimum spanning tree,traveling salesman problem,optimization problem,computer experiment,approximation algorithms | Approximation algorithm,Discrete mathematics,Combinatorics,Mathematical optimization,Heuristics,Travelling salesman problem,Minimum weight,Euclidean geometry,Optimization problem,Mathematics,Whippletree,Minimum spanning tree | Journal |
Volume | Citations | PageRank |
14, | 3 | 0.41 |
References | Authors | |
11 | 2 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Vladimir G. Deineko | 1 | 367 | 36.72 |
Alexander Tiskin | 2 | 220 | 15.50 |