Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
There is an increasing number of proteins with known structure but unknown function. Determining their function would have a significant impact on understanding diseases and designing new therapeutics. However, experimental protein function determination is expensive and very time-consuming. Computational methods can facilitate function determination by identifying proteins that have high structural and chemical similarity.We present LabelHash, a novel algorithm for matching substructural motifs to large collections of protein structures. The algorithm consists of two phases. In the first phase the proteins are preprocessed in a fashion that allows for instant lookup of partial matches to any motif. In the second phase, partial matches for a given motif are expanded to complete matches. The general applicability of the algorithm is demonstrated with three different case studies. First, we show that we can accurately identify members of the enolase superfamily with a single motif. Next, we demonstrate how LabelHash can complement SOIPPA, an algorithm for motif identification and pairwise substructure alignment. Finally, a large collection of Catalytic Site Atlas motifs is used to benchmark the performance of the algorithm. LabelHash runs very efficiently in parallel; matching a motif against all proteins in the 95% sequence identity filtered non-redundant Protein Data Bank typically takes no more than a few minutes. The LabelHash algorithm is available through a web server and as a suite of standalone programs at http://labelhash.kavrakilab.org. The output of the LabelHash algorithm can be further analyzed with Chimera through a plugin that we developed for this purpose.LabelHash is an efficient, versatile algorithm for large-scale substructure matching. When LabelHash is running in parallel, motifs can typically be matched against the entire PDB on the order of minutes. The algorithm is able to identify functional homologs beyond the twilight zone of sequence identity and even beyond fold similarity. The three case studies presented in this paper illustrate the versatility of the algorithm. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
|---|---|---|
2010 | 10.1186/1471-2105-11-555 | BMC Bioinformatics |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
protein structure,protein data bank,bioinformatics,algorithms,microarrays | Biology,Partial match,Structure–activity relationship,Protein function,Computational biology,Bioinformatics,Chemical similarity,Protein Data Bank,DNA microarray,Substructure,Protein structure | Journal |
Volume | Issue | ISSN |
11 | 1 | 1471-2105 |
Citations | PageRank | References |
19 | 0.67 | 23 |
Authors | ||
3 | ||
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mark Moll | 1 | 885 | 56.55 |
| Drew H. Bryant | 2 | 59 | 3.79 |
| Lydia E. Kavraki | 3 | 5370 | 470.50 |