Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
The newly established standards of CORBA and XML make it much easier to interoperate between different database software running on different platforms. We are using these in a mediator-based architecture that supports integrated access to biological databases. We discuss, in turn, design issues that arise from using each of the standards. In CORBA an important design issue is the use of coarse grain access, which supports a query language over an extensible integrated data model, as compared with fine grain access, which is tailored for specific queries. We discuss experience in using CORBA in these two ways. On the other hand we describe scenarios where returning results are communicated in XML format. We present a classification based on design choices. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2000 | 10.1007/3-540-45033-5_14 | BNCOD |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
integrated access,fine grain access,important design issue,coarse grain access,database federations,xml format,extensible integrated data model,design issue,design choice,design choices,different database software,different platform,query language,data model,biological database | Data mining,World Wide Web,Query language,XML,Interoperability,Computer science,Design choice,Common Object Request Broker Architecture,Biological database,XML database,Data model,Database | Conference |
Volume | ISSN | ISBN |
1832 | 0302-9743 | 3-540-67743-7 |
Citations | PageRank | References |
5 | 0.56 | 9 |
Authors | ||
4 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Graham J L Kemp | 1 | 238 | 49.92 |
Chris J. Robertson | 2 | 5 | 0.56 |
Peter M. D. Gray | 3 | 560 | 243.64 |
Nicos Angelopoulos | 4 | 53 | 11.48 |