Title | ||
---|---|---|
Salvaging The Spirit Of The Meter-Models Tradition: A Model Of Belief Revision By Way Of An Abstract Idealization Of Response To Incoming Evidence Delivery During The Construction Of Proof In Court |
Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
Inside the Juror (Hastie 1994) was, in a sense, a point of arrival for research developing formalisms that describe judicial decision making. Meter-based models of various kinds were mature, and even ready for giving way to such models that would concern themselves with the narrative content of the cases at hand, that a court is called to decide upon. Moreover, excessive emphasis was placed on lay factfinders, i.e. on jurors. It is noticeable that as "AI & Law" has become increasingly concerned with evidence in recent years - with efforts coordinated by Nissan & Martino, Zeleznikow, and others - the baggage of the meter-based models from jury research does not appear to be exploited. In this article, we try to combine their tradition with a technique of belief revision from artificial intelligence, in an attempt to provide an architectural component that would be complementary to models that apply representations or reasoning to legal narrative content. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2004 | 10.1080/08839510490279889 | APPLIED ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
belief revision,artificial intelligent | Computer science,Idealization,Narrative,Jury,Metre (music),Artificial intelligence,Judicial opinion,Epistemology,Rotation formalisms in three dimensions,Machine learning,Belief revision | Journal |
Volume | Issue | ISSN |
18.0 | 3-4 | 0883-9514 |
Citations | PageRank | References |
3 | 0.36 | 15 |
Authors | ||
2 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Aldo Franco Dragoni | 1 | 216 | 38.16 |
Ephraim Nissan | 2 | 164 | 21.59 |