Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
Contemporary modularization techniques, such as Aspect-Oriented Programming and Feature-Oriented Programming, allow designers to improve changeability and adaptability. However, the impact of advanced modularization techniques on productivity and quality remains unclear. This workshop emphasizes the need to improve the assessment of modern modularization techniques, particularly in the emerging domains of collaborative software engineering, ultra-large systems, cyber-physical systems, and cloud computing. The purpose of the 3rd ACoM workshop is (i) stimulate innovative ideas of modularity assessment methods; (ii) solicit experience reports from practitioners to understand the impact of contemporary modularization techniques; (iii) discuss the impact of assessment techniques; (iv) understand the applicability of assessment techniques; and (v) foster collaboration between practitioners and researchers. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2009 | 10.1145/1639950.1639979 | OOPSLA Companion |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
collaborative software engineering,modern modularization technique,modularity assessment method,contemporary modularization technique,cloud computing,advanced modularization technique,feature-oriented programming,aspect-oriented programming,acom workshop,assessment technique,adoption,costs and benefits,modularity,cyber physical systems,aspect oriented programming,software engineering,metrics,assessment,software development | Programming language,Personal software process,Software engineering,Computer science,Package development process,Software development process,Software verification and validation,Software construction,Modularity,Software development,Social software engineering | Conference |
Citations | PageRank | References |
0 | 0.34 | 17 |
Authors | ||
7 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Phil Greenwood | 1 | 348 | 20.93 |
Alessandro Garcia | 2 | 2231 | 143.70 |
Yuanfang Cai | 3 | 1169 | 76.99 |
Claudio Sant'Anna | 4 | 421 | 17.56 |
Kevin Sullivan | 5 | 1724 | 180.24 |
Thomas Cottenier | 6 | 148 | 11.02 |
James Noble | 7 | 1683 | 163.52 |