Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
this paper, we will take two large grammars, XTAG and CLE, and examine each of them fromthe other's point of view. We will find in both cases not only that important things are missing,but that the perspective offered by the other grammar suggests simple and practical ways offilling in the holes. It turns out that there is a pleasing symmetry to the picture. XTAG has avery good treatment of complement structure, which the CLE to some extent lacks; conversely,the CLE offers a powerful and... |
Year | Venue | Field |
|---|---|---|
2000 | Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research | Rule-based machine translation,Computer science,Grammar,Artificial intelligence,Natural language processing,The Thing,Linguistics |
DocType | Volume | Citations |
Journal | cs.CL/0006 | 0 |
PageRank | References | Authors |
0.34 | 3 | 3 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Beth Ann Hockey | 1 | 212 | 36.35 |
| Manny Rayner | 2 | 508 | 89.27 |
| Frankie James | 3 | 82 | 12.68 |