Title | ||
---|---|---|
How Can We Explain The Emergence Of A Language That Benefits The Hearer But Not The Speaker? |
Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
In this paper, we explore various adaptive factors that can influence the emergence of a communication system that benefits the receiver of signals (the hearer) but not the emitter (the speaker). Using computer simulations of a population of interacting agents whose behaviour is determined by a neural network, we show that a stable communication system does not emerge in groups of unrelated individuals because of its altruistic character. None the less, another set of simulations shows that the emergence of a language that confers an advantage only to hearers, not to speakers, is possible under at least three conditions: (1) if the hearer and the speaker tend to share the same genes, as predicted by kin selection theory; (2) if the population is 'docile' and the communication system is culturally transmitted together with other adaptive behaviours, as predicted by Simon's docility theory; and (3) if the linguistic system is used not only for social communication, but also for talking to oneself, in particular as an aid to memory. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2005 | 10.1080/09540090500177539 | CONNECTION SCIENCE |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
language evolution, alturism, neutral networks, kin selection, docility theory, talking to oneself | Intrapersonal communication,Population,Linguistic system,Neutral network,Altruism,Computer science,Communications system,Natural language,Artificial intelligence,Kin selection | Journal |
Volume | Issue | ISSN |
17 | 3-4 | 0954-0091 |
Citations | PageRank | References |
9 | 0.67 | 6 |
Authors | ||
2 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Marco Mirolli | 1 | 108 | 11.99 |
Domenico Parisi | 2 | 745 | 101.62 |