Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
In this paper, packet-level coding is considered in the framework of H.264/AVC video transmission. Two distinct solutions are proposed and compared in different realistic communication scenarios. The first is based on classical Reed-Solomon (RS) codes applied at the RTP layer, while the second on modern LDPC codes implemented at the UDP-Lite layer. An end-to-end Quality of Experience (QoE) evaluation is presented, in terms of achieved peak signal-to-noise power ratio (PSNR). Our numerical results show that, in low-latency video applications across communication channels introducing errors and erasures, the adoption of a packet-level coding scheme becomes essential to guarantee a satisfactory quality. The solution based on LDPC codes exhibits better performances in presence of severe packet loss rates. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2011 | 10.1109/VETECS.2011.5956635 | VTC Spring |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
ldpc codes,psnr,packet-level forward error correction,rs code,communication channels,udp-lite layer,h.264-avc video transmission,reed-solomon codes,qoe evaluation,data compression,error correction codes,peak signal-to-noise power ratio,rtp layer,low-latency video applications,video coding,reed-solomon code,ldpc code,decoding,low latency,reed solomon code,maximum likelihood,maintenance engineering,transport layer,encoding,forward error correction,payloads,low density parity check,reed solomon | Forward error correction,Computer science,Low-density parity-check code,Network packet,Packet loss,Reed–Solomon error correction,Electronic engineering,Coding (social sciences),Decoding methods,Data compression | Conference |
ISSN | ISBN | Citations |
1550-2252 | 978-1-4244-8332-7 | 4 |
PageRank | References | Authors |
0.46 | 7 | 6 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Matteo Mazzotti | 1 | 95 | 8.44 |
Enrico Paolini | 2 | 484 | 41.80 |
Marco Chiani | 3 | 1869 | 134.93 |
Benjamin Gadat | 4 | 16 | 3.43 |
Cyril Bergeron | 5 | 39 | 5.59 |
Roberta Fracchia | 6 | 122 | 11.54 |