Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
Preference-based argumentation frameworks are instantiation of Dung's framework in which the defeat relation (in the sense of Dung) is computed from an attack relation and a preference relation over the set of arguments. Value-based argumentation framework is a preference-based argumentation framework where the preference relation over arguments is derived from a preference relation over values they promote. We extend value-based argumentation framework with collective defeats and arguments promoting values with various strengths. In the extended framework, we define a function which computes the strength of a collective defeat. We define desired properties for the proposed function. Surprisingly, we show that this function obeying the corresponding properties is Choquet integral, a well-known aggregation function at work in multiple criteria decision. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
|---|---|---|
2013 | 10.1007/978-3-642-39091-3_26 | ECSQARU |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
proposed function,defeat relation,preference-based argumentation framework,collective defeat,preference relation,well-known aggregation function,attack relation,argumentation framework,value-based argumentation framework,extended framework,representing synergy | Argumentation framework,Mathematical economics,Preference relation,Multiple criteria,Computer science,Argumentation theory,Artificial intelligence,Choquet integral,Machine learning | Conference |
Citations | PageRank | References |
1 | 0.34 | 20 |
Authors | ||
2 | ||
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Souhila Kaci | 1 | 783 | 53.25 |
| Christophe Labreuche | 2 | 709 | 65.78 |