Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
Since the inception of elections and election technologies, all segments of the voting population have never been granted equal access, privacy and security to voting. Modern electronic voting systems have made attempts to include disabled voters but have fallen short. Using recent developments in technology a secure, user centered, multimodal electronic voting system has been developed to study a multimodal approach for providing equity in access, privacy and security in electronic voting. This article will report findings from a study at the Alabama Institute for the Deaf and Blind where more than thirty-five blind or visually impaired participants used the multimodal voting system. The findings suggest that the proposed multimodal approach to voting is easy to use and trustworthy. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
|---|---|---|
2010 | 10.1007/s10209-009-0181-0 | Universal Access in the Information Society |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
universal access,trustworthy. keywords electronic voting accessibility privacy blind prime iii,multimodal voting system,modern electronic voting system,electronic voting,multimodal electronic voting system,alabama institute,proposed multimodal approach,voting population,disabled voter,multimodal approach,equal access,accessibility,privacy | Population,Electronic voting,Internet privacy,Voting,Computer science,Computer security,Trustworthiness,Universal design,Equity (finance) | Journal |
Volume | Issue | ISSN |
9 | 4 | 1615-5297 |
Citations | PageRank | References |
13 | 1.61 | 3 |
Authors | ||
10 | ||
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Juan E. Gilbert | 1 | 170 | 44.51 |
| Yolanda McMillian | 2 | 29 | 4.64 |
| Ken Rouse | 3 | 13 | 1.61 |
| Philicity Williams | 4 | 35 | 5.15 |
| Gregory Rogers | 5 | 16 | 2.39 |
| Jerome Mcclendon | 6 | 18 | 5.21 |
| Winfred Mitchell | 7 | 13 | 1.61 |
| Priyanka Gupta | 8 | 127 | 7.39 |
| Idong Mkpong-Ruffin | 9 | 13 | 1.61 |
| E. Vincent Cross, Ii | 10 | 36 | 6.43 |