Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
E-Science users will want to construct, share, execute and monitor sequence of tasks. These tasks may execute on machines ranging from their local workstations to high-end, grid-enabled compute resources. Often, these tasks are legacy applications written in various programming and scripting languages and are designed to be run in a single user environment rather than as a Web application. These tasks often need to be tied together into composite applications that need to span multiple computing resources. The majority of the scientific experiments in E-Science involve orchestrating multiple tasks in the correct fashion to produce scientific computational experiments. Scientific workflows have proven to be a coherent and abstract framework that is capable of capturing such scientific experiments and hence have gained popularity among the scientific community. Many of the current E-Science projects have adopted different workflow systems and consequently have adopted custom workflow execution and description standards. We argue that the core of the execution semantics used by most scientific workflows can be expressed as a small common set, and we further investigate the possibility of having a higher level workflow description language that is capable of capturing and possibly bridging these different workflow systems. In this demonstration we present a set of E-Science development tools for managing these problems: a high level workflow composition monitoring and enactment tool, a toolkit that is capable of providing Web service interfaces for command line scientific applications, and a service registry that is used as a repository for sharing. This domain independent workflow suite will allow users from wide verity of environments to selectively and securely share their applications as Web services and construct workflows with these services. The suite also features on-demand service creation, workflow orchestration and monitoring. Furthermore, these components ca- - n be used individually or collectively to build a small to large-scale E-Science infrastructures. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
|---|---|---|
2008 | 10.1109/eScience.2008.149 | Indianapolis, IN |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
e-science projects,domain independent workflow suite,scientific community,scientific workflows,custom workflow execution,open grid computing environment,scientific computational experiment,different workflow system,command line scientific application,high level workflow composition,higher level workflow description,workflow suite,scientific experiment,software maintenance,web services,computer architecture,graphical user interfaces,grid,bpel,lead,system monitoring,scientific computing,scripting language,web service,logic gates,grid computing | Workflow technology,World Wide Web,Computer science,Windows Workflow Foundation,Business Process Execution Language,Web service,Workflow engine,Workflow management system,Workflow,Scripting language | Conference |
ISBN | Citations | PageRank |
978-0-7695-3535-7 | 1 | 0.37 |
References | Authors | |
2 | 4 | |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Suresh Marru | 1 | 253 | 40.15 |
| Marlon Pierce | 2 | 322 | 40.79 |
| Chathura Herath | 3 | 128 | 11.74 |
| Srinath Perera | 4 | 332 | 32.23 |