Paper Info
Title
Understanding the information and communication technology needs of the e-humanist
Abstract
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to understand the needs of humanists with respect to information and communication technology (ICT) in order to prescribe the design of an e-humanist's workbench. Design/methodology/approach - A web-based survey comprising over 60 questions gathered the following data from 169 humanists: profile of the humanist, use of ICT in teaching, e-texts, text analysis tools, access to and use of primary and secondary sources, and use of collaboration and communication tools. Findings - Humanists conduct varied forms of research and use multiple techniques. They rely on the availability of inexpensive, duality-controlled e-texts for their research. The existence of primary sources in digital form influences the type of research conducted. They are unaware of existing tools for conducting text analyses, but expressed a need for better tools. Search engines have replaced the library catalogue as the key access tool for sources. Research continues to be solitary with little collaboration among scholars. Research limitations/implications - The results are based On a self-selected sample of humanists who responded to a web-based survey. Future research needs to examine the work of the scholar at a more detailed level, preferably through observation and/or interviewing. Practical implications - The findings support a five-part framework that could serve as the basis for the design of an e-humanist's workbench. Originality/value - The paper examines the needs of the humanist, founded on an integration of information science research and humanities computing for a more comprehensive understanding of the humanist at work.
Year
DOI
Venue
2008
10.1108/00220410810844178
JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION
Keywords
DocType
Volume
humanistic philosophy,research,electronic media,communication technologies
Journal
64
Issue
ISSN
Citations 
1
0022-0418
20
PageRank 
References 
Authors
1.48
7
2
Name
Order
Citations
PageRank
Elaine G. Toms1127796.35
Heather L. O'Brien262433.21