Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
In today's business world, there exist multitudinous tools to model processes. For an automatic layout algorithm for those processes, it is important to take into account criteria like process flow and the semantic of the modeling notation. Most of the existing tools use standard layout approaches that often produce unsatisfying results since the calculated drawings are too dense and/or too large. This makes it difficult for users to understand the underlying process model. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
|---|---|---|
2008 | 10.1007/978-3-642-00219-9_44 | Graph Drawing |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
automatic layout algorithm,business processes,modeling notation,account criterion,existing tool,standard layout approach,process flow,model process,enhancing visualizations,underlying process model,calculated drawing,business world,business process,process model | Artifact-centric business process model,Discrete mathematics,Notation,Business process,Software engineering,Computer science,Process modeling,Business process modeling,Business process discovery,Business Process Model and Notation,Management science,Business rule | Conference |
Volume | ISSN | Citations |
5417 | 0302-9743 | 4 |
PageRank | References | Authors |
0.50 | 3 | 3 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Philip Effinger | 1 | 41 | 5.10 |
| Michael Kaufmann | 2 | 1224 | 107.33 |
| Martin Siebenhaller | 3 | 84 | 6.48 |