Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
This paper presents an Adaptive Greedy-compass Energy-aware Multipath protocol (AGEM), a novel routing protocol for wireless multimedia sensors networks (WMSNs). AGEM uses sensors node positions to make packet forwarding decisions. These decisions are made online, at each forwarding node, in such a way that there is no need for global network topology knowledge and maintenance. AGEM routing protocol performs load-balancing to minimize energy consumption among nodes using twofold policy: (1) smart greedy forwarding, based on adaptive compass and (2) walking back forwarding to avoid holes. Performance evaluations of AGEM compared to GPSR (Greedy Perimeter Stateless Routing) show that AGEM can: (a) maximize the network lifetime, (b) guarantee quality of service for video stream transmission, and (c) scale better on densely deployed wireless sensors network. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2012 | 10.1109/CCNC.2010.5421726 | CCNC'10 Proceedings of the 7th IEEE conference on Consumer communications and networking conference |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
wireless multimedia sensors network,packet forwarding decision,global network topology knowledge,forwarding node,wireless sensors network,smart greedy forwarding,adaptive greedy-compass energy-aware multipath,network lifetime,sensors node position,agem routing protocol,packet forwarding,routing protocol,load balance,multipath routing,wireless sensor network,quality of service,routing protocols,network topology,wireless sensor networks,sensor network | Multipath routing,Wireless,Computer science,Quality of service,Computer network,Geographic routing,Wireless sensor network,Stateless protocol,Packet forwarding,Distributed computing,Routing protocol | Journal |
Volume | ISSN | ISBN |
abs/1205.2350 | 7th IEEE Consumer Communications and Networking Conference (CCNC),
2010, Las Vegas : United States (2010) | 978-1-4244-5176-0 |
Citations | PageRank | References |
11 | 0.64 | 13 |
Authors | ||
3 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Samir Medjiah | 1 | 138 | 11.54 |
Toufik Ahmed | 2 | 346 | 41.85 |
francine krief | 3 | 121 | 26.99 |