Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
Cloud Computing (CC) is a technological phenomenon that is becoming more and more important. Also Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) can increase their competitiveness by taking advantage of CC. This new computing approach promises to provide many advantages, and many SMEs are encouraged to use it. However, CC is still in its early stage -- for this reason we think that it is very important to study and assess its impact on SMEs' management processes. In this paper we propose a model for studying how Global Software Development can be facilitated using Cloud development environments, compared to a more traditional development environment. We use system dynamics to model and simulate how effective Cloud-based software development environments are for Global Software Development performed by a SMEs. Both studied environments assume a development process based on Scrum agile methodology. The proposed model could be used as a tool by the project managers to understand how Cloud Development Environments might facilitate Global Software Development. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2012 | 10.1109/SEAA.2012.67 | Software Engineering and Advanced Applications |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
medium enterprises,global software development,cloud development environments,traditional development environment,cloud development environment,cloud computing,development process,cloud platforms,scrum agile methodology,effective cloud-based software development,computational modeling,hardware,modeling,scrum,system dynamics,planning,simulation | Scrum,Small and medium-sized enterprises,Management process,Systems engineering,Development environment,Computer science,Global software development,System dynamics,Empirical process (process control model),Cloud computing | Conference |
ISSN | ISBN | Citations |
1089-6503 | 978-1-4673-2451-9 | 5 |
PageRank | References | Authors |
0.45 | 8 | 3 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Luisanna Cocco | 1 | 27 | 4.76 |
Katiuscia Mannaro | 2 | 76 | 7.52 |
Giulio Concas | 3 | 424 | 44.83 |